Bird courses Liberal studies Compare

Loading…

Data sourced from RateMyProfessors. Not affiliated with TMU.

Built by Sayeem Mahfuz

CPS125 — Computer Science | ProfPulse

Back to search Compare

CPS125

Computer Science

352 reviews•34 professors

3.8

Quality

2.7

Difficulty

Declining

76%

Would take again

3.1

Recent quality

34 reviews, past 2 years

2001

First reviewed

Jun 2026

Last reviewed

Grade distribution

(113 reported)

A+

21%

A

15%

A-

12%

B+

9%

B

5%

B-

4%

C+

1%

C

3%

C-

1%

D

3%

D-

4%

F

2%

N/A

14%

N/S

7%

Professors teaching this course

Denis Hamelin

Computer Science

4.5

Quality

1.8

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2025

Eric Harley

Computer Science

4.4

Quality

1.8

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2025

Isaac Woungang

Computer Science

3.0

Quality

3.2

Difficulty

89%

Would retake

Last taught 2026

Cherie Ding

Computer Science

3.3

Quality

2.5

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2026

Qinmin (Vivian) Hu

Computer Science

2.6

Quality

3.9

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2026

Maryam Davoudpour

Computer Science

4.4

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

75%

Would retake

Last taught 2021

Manar Alalfi

Computer Science

3.3

Quality

2.3

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2025

Mehrdad Tirandazian

Computer Science

4.1

Quality

2.8

Difficulty

91%

Would retake

Last taught 2021

Soheila Tajali

Information Technology

4.0

Quality

2.2

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2022

Fatema Rashid

Computer Science

4.0

Quality

4.0

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2021

Lester Hiraki

Computer Science

4.3

Quality

2.8

Difficulty

67%

Would retake

Last taught 2019

Joshua Panar

Computer Science

2.6

Quality

3.2

Difficulty

10%

Would retake

Last taught 2020

Alex Ferworn

Computer Science

4.8

Quality

2.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2006

Sadaf Mustafiz

Computer Science

2.2

Quality

3.6

Difficulty

50%

Would retake

Last taught 2022

Alessandro Cunsolo

Computer Science

5.0

Quality

1.0

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2017

Bart Gajderowicz

Computer Science

3.3

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2019

Dr. Soheila Bashardoust-Tajali

Computer Science

1.0

Quality

5.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2023

Glaucio Carvalho

Computer Science

3.9

Quality

2.4

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2016

Marcus V Santos

Computer Science

3.6

Quality

2.7

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2010

Michael Kolios

Physics

4.8

Quality

3.5

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2002

Hamid Timorabadi

Computer Science

5.0

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2013

George Giordano

Mathematics

5.0

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2004

Alireza Sadeghian

Computer Science

4.0

Quality

1.8

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2005

Konstantinos Derpanis

Computer Science

4.5

Quality

2.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2013

Carl Kumaradas

Physics

4.5

Quality

2.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2006

Margaret Buckby

Physics

4.5

Quality

2.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2002

Denise Woit

Computer Science

4.0

Quality

1.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2005

Mikhail Soutchanski

Computer Science

3.0

Quality

4.0

Difficulty

100%

Would retake

Last taught 2017

Ilkka Kokkarinen

Computer Science

3.3

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2016

Alex Ufkes

Computer Science

3.0

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2017

Anastase Mastoras

Computer Science

3.5

Quality

2.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2011

Rachel Jiang

Computer Science

2.5

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2005

Abdolreza Abhari

Computer Science

1.9

Quality

2.3

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2007

Andriy Pavlovych

Computer Science

1.0

Quality

3.0

Difficulty

N/A

Would retake

Last taught 2017

Course trends over time

Quality

Difficulty

2020

3.8

12 reviews

2021

3.5

14 reviews

2022

2.3

11 reviews

2024

5.0

5 reviews

2025

1.9

17 reviews

2026

3.9

12 reviews