peter krol

lectures are lowkey boring unless the content interests you. there's so much material in every class and it doesn't matter if the slideshows are 60 or 150 slides long, he starts slow and then speeds up towards the end. if you need help he's very nice and resourceful. i just hate how there's only 2 exams and we get such short breaks for a 3h class.

He is an amazing professor, but the lectures were quite long and honestly boring. The course consist of 1 midterm and a final. A lot of memorization is required to do well in this course. He usually provides an outline of what to expect in the finals, which made it less difficult.

Dr. Krol's lectures were extremely long, being up to 150 slides and were very boring. Although the course material is not too difficult, its graded entirely off the midterm (40%) and final exam (60%). Exams are completely memorization based, so you have to dedicate all your time towards rereading all the slides.

- Heavy course material, lectures can be dry. 150 slides per class ( as there is no textbook) - Attendance is needed to understand the context of the content. - Grade is midterm and final exam ( 40%- 60% split) Quite brutal but the exam questions are straightforward. Show up for your classes and study, and you will pass with a decent grade

Prof Krol was very nice but could not teach. Lectures composed of over 150 slides per class and he was very quiet. He was very nice but teaching is not his thing. Only marked based on 2 things, midterm and final worth 40% and 60%. Top much material to absorb in one class

his lectures make no sense he overcomplicates everything when he can be so simple. his slides are 2393921 slides long and he gives 2 minute breaks for a 3 hour class. he splits the whole course into a 40% midterm and 60% final....

lectures make no sense and he's bad at explaining. material is super heavy and he splits the course into a 40% midterm and 60% final. impossible

class is split 40% midterm 60% final exam. blud is so lazy