Loading…
Loading…
Architecture
2.7
Overall rating
Below average
2.2
Difficulty level
Easy
33%
Would take again
Based on 6 reviews
2021
Last active
3 courses taught
Showing 6 of 6 reviews
He is a good guy and very chill but his lectures and projects were disorganized. He reads from Wikipedia for at least some of his lectures... Quizzes are easy marks if you can follow the lectures. The projects are good but the outline/instructions are unclear and confusing.
He'll nitpick at certain parts of your design and say nothing about it as a whole for the majority of the project then say "you need to develop the whole thing more" the LAST CLASS before a studio deadline. In class, he'll ask good questions to get you thinking but then proceed to melt your brain by talking in such a roundabout and confusing way.
Such an easy guy to talk to and get his opinion on work. Was available to always talk to outside of class about anything not clear in homework. Took the time in studio class to joke around and get to know us rather than be super work heavy. Not many like him!
A lot of things to cover in the little amount of time. Lecture slides are super long and often skips a lot so you left confused and a lot of it is from wikipedia.
Nice guy and super kind. The quizzes so far have been really easy and very informative, allowing us to reinforce our learning in the course. A lot of reading so far but the book is a bit pricey. Have to come to class in order to get a grade. Super funny guy and great voice :).
This prof taught ASC 206 the history class for first year architecture second semester and GOD this professor doesnt care about what hes talking about. I think I nearly fell asleep in all of his lectures because he just has such a monotone voice and just reads off Wikipedia. You have to read a bunch and do quizzes its sooo waste