Loading…
Loading…
Mechanical Engineering
2.2
Overall rating
Poor
3.9
Difficulty level
Moderate
27%
Would take again
Based on 28 reviews
2026
Last active
2 courses taught
Showing 10 of 29 reviews
Teaches engineer courses but is not an engineer.
Marks attendance as if it is mandatory even though it is not, gives absolutely no feedback and delegates all the work to his TAs. Absolutely no feedback or support to students. Gives questions on exams that are not found in any of the course notes. Learned everything he taught in Kindergarten. Fake career, Fake everything.
no feedback no nothing, ai can teach better than him.
You'll open the test and see questions on things that aren't in the textbook, aren't in the slides, and never mentioned in class. I remember memorizing all the questions that I didn't know the answer to while taking the midterm so I could search for the answers later in textbook or lectures. Guess what? Found nothing!
Great professor. Explains concepts really well and adds a relatable example to make stuff easier to understand. He is always to answer questions and help students if needed.
great prof, the midterm and final are multiple choice. The project required some work but was easier compared to other classes. You need to read and memorize the slides but his content is good and the prof does engage with students. I enjoyed that we had 3 guest speakers during the semester showing how this stuff applies to the real world
Meh. But like he kinda cares about u if approach him to ask Questions
Have you seen a paranoid instructor who hate engineering students? I think not in engineering department. Has a colleague/body instructor who is just another rude guy and you will have picture of department W.C. In one of the slides. Obviously, TAs do the all work. Very sorry for this engineering department.
hard quizzes and relatively easy final. His assignments are all papers which you have to write perfectly to even get a decent mark. Lectures were dry as hell but some of the material might be interesting to some.
-Lectures are engaging and free flowing; -Case studies and examples are so specific that you don't learn general principles; -Evaluation methods are poor; little feedback is given; -Says he doesn't like lists of memorized facts, but heavily penalizes if you don't include them; -Criteria for correct answers is extremely strict and redundant.