Richard Wade

Richard Wade is an amazing professor. The insights and wisdom you receive from his amazing lectures are just breathtaking and inspirational. Learning from such a fantastic professor shows just how high of a caliber professor Richard Wade is. I absolutely suggest taking this man's class and you will learn so much from him. Overall 10/10, no regrets.

Unclear in his expectations for projects and tests. Terrible lecturer, using outdated examples and slides. Completely uncharistmatic. Worst class I have taken at Ryerson.

He is a terrible professor. Extremely difficult to understand his lectures in addition to his assignments. On top of that he is rude and condescending with remarks he makes to questions. I dropped his class and am re-taking with another professor now who makes the class so much easier.

Good prof. He knows what he's talking about. BUT if you don't listen or come to class, you will not have a clue as to what he's saying and will probably fail this course. Group projects are long and confusing. Overall, tough grader but great prof. It is his last year at Ryerson so for anyone reading this, you're off the hook ;)

actually pretty useful if you go to his office and ask questions, and pretty nice if there's a problem you need help with. Took me 3 mandatory courses with him to finally learn that

yo dawg this guy is my fav prof ever. His class 10/10 would take again. so lit. had a blast.

This guy is the worst prof i ever had, boring, rude, outdated, and a tough marker. please get rid of this prof

He's boring, apathetic, has no personality, and does not even try to engage the class. The aforementioned wouldn't be a problem if he were at least a fair marker as a prof. Good luck hospitality students, there's really no avoiding him. He's the reason why I switched my program to BM- hosp profs have no personality, ironically enough

AVOID THIS MAN LIKE THE PLAGUE AT ALL COSTS

This course and HTM 402 need to be re -evaluated. They're awful and are made worse by Wade. Unlike other professors who tell you all that they want for a project in one single document, he scatters information into tiny bits and pieces making everything ambiguous. His marking is all over the place and often contradictory. Exam's were unfair too.